Nepal Parliament Endorses 4 Ordinances, Land Bill Opposed
Nepal's House of Representatives endorsed 4 ordinances, but a land-related bill faced opposition from coalition partners. The fate of the bill hangs in the balance as it requires approval from both houses of parliament.
Kathmandu, Mar 5 (PTI) The House of Representatives on Wednesday endorsed four ordinances tabled by the government, which did not push for land related enactment after two of its coalition partners opposed some of its provisions.
The ordinances related to good governance, financial procedure, privatisation and investment promotion were cleared while the one related to cooperatives tabled by the government is still awaiting endorsement from the House.
President Ram Chandra Paudel had issued four ordinances on good governance, financial procedures, privatisation, and financial procedures on January 13; the land-related ordinance was issued on January 15, and the cooperative-related ordinance was brought on January 27.
However, after the coalition partners had agreed not to push forward the land related ordinance, the government did not present it in the House of Representatives on Wednesday as the Madhes based parties had opposed some of its provisions.
Earlier on Tuesday, following the Parliament's Business Advisory Committee meeting, Shyam Ghimire, the Nepali Congress chief whip said, All the ordinances except one will be put to vote on Wednesday.
The decision on the land-related ordinance will be taken after further discussions between the parties in the ruling alliance, The Kathmandu Post said quoting Ghimire.
Prior to that, a meeting of the ruling coalition on Sunday evening had decided to hold off the ordinance. The coalition concluded that further discussions were needed on the ordinance to amend the Land Act following reservations from the JSP-Nepal and the LSP on some of its provisions, The Kathmandu Post quoted Bishnu Rimal, chief advisor to the prime minister, as saying.
The fate of the land-related ordinance had become uncertain in February when the two of the coalition parties the Janata Samajbadi Party Nepal (JSP-Nepal) and the Loktantrik Samajbadi Party (LSP) had opposed it claiming that it favours the land mafia, and declared that they will not support the government in either house of parliament.
Vice chairman of JSP Raj Kishor Yadav had then said that while JSP-Nepal would not support the land-related ordinance, as it undermines the rights of the landless people of the Terai regions, the southern plains of Nepal.
The party described the ordinance as being in favour of land mafia and claimed, it would not benefit genuine landless people, but rather serve the interests of land brokers.
JSP has a decisive role in the National Assembly (Upper House) as currently, the ruling coalition's strength in the NA stands at 27 seats, while the opposition parties have 26 seats. Therefore, JSP-Nepal's three votes could be the deciding factor.
There are in total 59 seats in the Upper House; 30 votes are required to endorse any ordinance with a majority vote.
The ordinances need to get endorsement from the National Assembly or the Upper House, before they are replaced by bills.
If the government fails to pass any of the six ordinances currently under discussion in the Parliament, the coalition may face a crisis.
The ordinances related to good governance, financial procedure, privatisation and investment promotion were cleared while the one related to cooperatives tabled by the government is still awaiting endorsement from the House.
President Ram Chandra Paudel had issued four ordinances on good governance, financial procedures, privatisation, and financial procedures on January 13; the land-related ordinance was issued on January 15, and the cooperative-related ordinance was brought on January 27.
However, after the coalition partners had agreed not to push forward the land related ordinance, the government did not present it in the House of Representatives on Wednesday as the Madhes based parties had opposed some of its provisions.
Earlier on Tuesday, following the Parliament's Business Advisory Committee meeting, Shyam Ghimire, the Nepali Congress chief whip said, All the ordinances except one will be put to vote on Wednesday.
The decision on the land-related ordinance will be taken after further discussions between the parties in the ruling alliance, The Kathmandu Post said quoting Ghimire.
Prior to that, a meeting of the ruling coalition on Sunday evening had decided to hold off the ordinance. The coalition concluded that further discussions were needed on the ordinance to amend the Land Act following reservations from the JSP-Nepal and the LSP on some of its provisions, The Kathmandu Post quoted Bishnu Rimal, chief advisor to the prime minister, as saying.
The fate of the land-related ordinance had become uncertain in February when the two of the coalition parties the Janata Samajbadi Party Nepal (JSP-Nepal) and the Loktantrik Samajbadi Party (LSP) had opposed it claiming that it favours the land mafia, and declared that they will not support the government in either house of parliament.
Vice chairman of JSP Raj Kishor Yadav had then said that while JSP-Nepal would not support the land-related ordinance, as it undermines the rights of the landless people of the Terai regions, the southern plains of Nepal.
The party described the ordinance as being in favour of land mafia and claimed, it would not benefit genuine landless people, but rather serve the interests of land brokers.
JSP has a decisive role in the National Assembly (Upper House) as currently, the ruling coalition's strength in the NA stands at 27 seats, while the opposition parties have 26 seats. Therefore, JSP-Nepal's three votes could be the deciding factor.
There are in total 59 seats in the Upper House; 30 votes are required to endorse any ordinance with a majority vote.
The ordinances need to get endorsement from the National Assembly or the Upper House, before they are replaced by bills.
If the government fails to pass any of the six ordinances currently under discussion in the Parliament, the coalition may face a crisis.