Competition Commission Clears Google in Truecaller Case
By Rediff Money Desk, New Delhi Jun 27, 2024 15:18
India's Competition Commission has dismissed a complaint against Google alleging favoritism towards Truecaller in the caller ID app market, finding no evidence of antitrust violations.
New Delhi, Jun 27 (PTI) The Competition Commission of India has dismissed a complaint against Google India alleging the tech giant abused its dominant position to favour Truecaller in the market for caller ID and spam protection apps, as it found no evidence of violation of competition law.
While dismissing the complaint, the fair trade regulator said, "The Commission finds that no prima facie case of contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Act is made out against Google in the instant matter".
Section 4 of the Competition Act, deals with the abuse of dominant position.
The ruling came on a complaint filed by Rachna Khaira (informant) accusing Google of granting exclusive access to Truecaller to share private contact information while prohibiting other apps from doing the same.
Further, she alleged that this practice has distorted the market and created a monopoly for Truecaller.
The informant also alleged that Google's developer policy prohibits unauthorised disclosure of non-public contacts, and Truecaller's privacy policy, to which she argued allowed the sharing of such information.
Further, Khaira alleged that Google favoured Truecaller due to commercial arrangements involving Google's cloud storage and advertising services.
The regulator after reviewing submissions from both Google and Khaira, found that the informant's claims were unsubstantiated.
"...the allegation of the Informant remains unsubstantiated and despite sufficient opportunity, the informant has not provided any evidence to prima facie establish that Google is according either preferential treatment to Truecaller or resorting to discriminatory practises by allowing access to user's contact data to Truecaller while denying the same to the competing applications," CCI said in an order on June 24.
The competition watchdog also addressed the commercial relationship allegations against the tech major, stating that mere commercial relationships do not imply preferential treatment unless proven.
However, the regulator found no evidence suggesting that these changes granted Truecaller a competitive advantage over its rivals.
The request for interim relief by the informant to temporarily block Truecaller from operating on the Play Store was also rejected by the competition watchdog.
"The Commission finds that no prima facie case of contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Act is made out against Google in the instant matter.
"Accordingly, the Information is ordered to be closed," the fair trade regulator said.
While dismissing the complaint, the fair trade regulator said, "The Commission finds that no prima facie case of contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Act is made out against Google in the instant matter".
Section 4 of the Competition Act, deals with the abuse of dominant position.
The ruling came on a complaint filed by Rachna Khaira (informant) accusing Google of granting exclusive access to Truecaller to share private contact information while prohibiting other apps from doing the same.
Further, she alleged that this practice has distorted the market and created a monopoly for Truecaller.
The informant also alleged that Google's developer policy prohibits unauthorised disclosure of non-public contacts, and Truecaller's privacy policy, to which she argued allowed the sharing of such information.
Further, Khaira alleged that Google favoured Truecaller due to commercial arrangements involving Google's cloud storage and advertising services.
The regulator after reviewing submissions from both Google and Khaira, found that the informant's claims were unsubstantiated.
"...the allegation of the Informant remains unsubstantiated and despite sufficient opportunity, the informant has not provided any evidence to prima facie establish that Google is according either preferential treatment to Truecaller or resorting to discriminatory practises by allowing access to user's contact data to Truecaller while denying the same to the competing applications," CCI said in an order on June 24.
The competition watchdog also addressed the commercial relationship allegations against the tech major, stating that mere commercial relationships do not imply preferential treatment unless proven.
However, the regulator found no evidence suggesting that these changes granted Truecaller a competitive advantage over its rivals.
The request for interim relief by the informant to temporarily block Truecaller from operating on the Play Store was also rejected by the competition watchdog.
"The Commission finds that no prima facie case of contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Act is made out against Google in the instant matter.
"Accordingly, the Information is ordered to be closed," the fair trade regulator said.
Source: PTI
Read More On:
DISCLAIMER - This article is from a syndicated feed. The original source is responsible for accuracy, views & content ownership. Views expressed may not reflect those of rediff.com India Limited.
You May Like To Read
TODAY'S MOST TRADED COMPANIES
- Company Name
- Price
- Volume
- Vodafone Idea L
- 13.35 ( -11.53)
- 166225069
- Rama Steel Tubes
- 16.68 (+ 20.00)
- 60645501
- Rajnish Wellness
- 3.69 (+ 1.10)
- 41851679
- GTL Infrastructure
- 2.46 ( -3.53)
- 31494599
- ARC Finance
- 1.63 ( 0.00)
- 30319737
MORE NEWS
Delhi Opposes GST on Online Transactions,...
Delhi Finance Minister Atishi condemns Centre's proposed GST on online transactions...
Incuspaze Expands Managed Workspace in...
Coworking firm Incuspaze expands its managed workspace business in Bengaluru, leasing...
Jio Financial ''BlackRock Form JV for...
Jio Financial Services and BlackRock Advisors have formed a joint venture to offer...